◢The Player Line one subject, one line Open the partner account
paid
Affiliate disclosure. The partner link in the masthead and in the band beside the copy on this page is a sponsored link to a partner operator, and this site may be paid if you open an account through it, at no extra cost to you. It carries rel="sponsored noopener" and opens in a new tab. A desk about the market on one person should not leave its own funding unsaid: one link funds the site, no operator and no player, team or market is named, rated or recommended anywhere on it, and the site carries no affiliate ranking of any kind.
The Player Line / Overview
One player, one stat, and a line an estimate of minutes sets

The Player Line: the market that is about one person

A team market is about an event that will happen. A market on one person is about what a person will do inside it, and it rests on two estimates nobody can observe: how long the player will be on the pitch, and what he will do per minute while there. This desk is about that second subject - the single player as a priced, settled bet, the sentence in the rules that decides whether the bet is settled at all, the source that counts the stat afterwards, and why a market about a person carries a smaller limit than the match it sits in.

Desk spec
samples
10 invented
expected minutes
78.0
fair price
2.93
offered price
2.70
the projectionWhat a player is expected to do: an expected-minutes figure multiplied by a per-90 rate. The sample player is expected to play 78.0 minutes at 1.40 shots on target per 90, so the model expects 1.21 of them rather than the 1.40 a full match would imply.
the participation definitionWhat the operator's rules mean by "to play". Across 400 sampled single-player markets the same bets stand 308 times under "named in the starting XI" and 369 times under "takes the field", so the definition decides whether the bet is settled at all.
the confirmationThe source that counts the stat after the match and the audit behind it. 14 of 1,200 sampled markets were corrected after first publication, 5 of them more than an hour later, and 3 after the payout had already been made.
What "to play" means, and what it costssample B / 400 single-player markets
named in the starting XI308 stand92 void
takes the field at all369 stand31 void
plays at least 60 minutes331 stand69 void
completes the match297 stand103 void
the swing 92 to 103 bets void, depending on the wording23.0% to 25.75% of the same book

four definitions, one match: the same bet is settled, or returned, by a sentence in the rules rather than by anything the player does.

How one player becomes a line and a pricesample A / one attacking midfielder, invented
expected minutes78.0of 90
per-90 rate for the stat1.40shots on target
expected output (78/90 x 1.40)1.21the model's mean
the line the market sets1.5two or more
fair price from the projection2.9334.10%
price the operator offers2.7037.04%
the minutes swing 66 minutes prices at 3.63; 90 minutes prices at 2.45a 1.18 band = 40.3% of 2.93

The bar the reader would use is a full match, and it is the wrong one. Every figure here follows from the 78.0-minute estimate: move the minutes twelve either way and the fair price moves from 2.45 to 3.63, which is the whole of the desk.

one player, one stat, one line; the price is an estimate of the minutes before it is a view of the player.

Direct answer

A market on one player is priced from a projection of that player's output - an expected-minutes figure multiplied by a per-90 rate - and settled against a definition of "to play" written in the operator's rules. The sample player is expected to play 78.0 minutes at 1.40 shots on target per 90, so the model expects 1.21 of them, the line is set at 1.5, and the fair price is 2.93 against an offered 2.70.

What the samples show

The whole subject sits in one estimate. A full match would imply 1.40 shots on target for the sample player, which prices the market at 2.45. The projection says he will play 78.0 minutes, not 90, so the expected output is 1.21 and the honest price is 2.93. The 0.48 of price between the two figures is not a margin and not a view about the player: it is twelve minutes of expected absence.

The second finding is that the bet itself is fragile. Of 400 sampled single-player markets, 308 stand under a rule that means "named in the starting XI" and 369 stand under a rule that means "takes the field", so between 92 and 103 of the same 400 bets are returned rather than settled - by the wording, not by the player. A desk about one person has to be about that sentence as much as about the projection.

None of the samples describes a real operator, player, team or match. They are ten invented sets of counts, minutes and prices, defined on this page, and every other figure on the site is derived from them.

Ten samples

Sample A
The projection

One player, one stat.

expected minutes
78.0
expected output
1.21
fair / offered
2.93 / 2.70
Sample B
The definitions

Four words for "to play".

stand, in the XI
308
stand, takes the field
369
of the sample
400
Sample C
The confirmation

Who counts the stat.

settled
1,200
corrected
14
after payout
3
Sample D
The correlation

One player against the team.

scores when it wins
30.0%
overall
21.25%
fair price
4.71
Sample E
The limits

The ceiling on a person.

player maximum
800.00
team maximum
5,000.00
payout ceiling
12,000.00
Sample F
The record

Thirty-six rule pages, read.

settle a player market
22
define "to play"
14
all six rules
1
Sample G
The money

One month of single-player bets.

turnover
75,200.00
settled
7,380
retained
7.92%
Sample H
The lag

From whistle to settlement.

median
22 min
inside 30 min
68.0%
90th percentile
3 h 05 m

Two further samples are defined on the pages that use them: sample I on the tie between two providers, and sample J on how wide the minutes estimate really is.

The desk in one table

The clearest place to start is the estimate that decides the price: how long the player is expected to be on the pitch, and what that does to the number.

Sample A - one player's projection, the line and the price
StepValuePrice it impliesWhere it comes from
A full match assumed1.402.45Per-90 rate carried across all 90 minutes
The projection (78.0 minutes)1.212.9378/90 x 1.40, priced from the chance of 2 or more
What the twelve minutes are worth on a 10.00 stake0.484.8024.50 against 29.30 returned at the fair prices
sample A - from minutes to a price expected minutes = 78.0 of 90 per-90 rate for the stat = 1.40 shots on target expected output = 1.40 x 78.0 / 90 = 1.2133 -> 1.21 the line the market sets = 1.5, so the bet is "2 or more" with a mean of 1.21, the chance of 2 or more: P(0) = e^-1.21 = 0.29820 P(1) = 1.21 x 0.29820 = 0.36082 P(2 or more) = 1 - 0.29820 - 0.36082 = 34.10% fair price = 1 / 0.3410 = 2.93 the operator offers 2.70, implying 37.04%: the difference of 2.94 points is the margin, not the projection.
sample G - why the participation definition is money bets in the month = 8,000 at a mean stake of 9.40 turnover = 8,000 x 9.40 = 75,200.00 settled under "takes the field" = 7,380 = 92.25% returned because the player did not play = 620 = 7.75% = 5,828.00 returned of the 7,380 settled, the stat cleared = 7,380 x 0.3410 = 2,517 paid at the offered 2.70 = 2,517 x 9.40 x 2.70 = 63,881.46 retained = 69,372.00 - 63,881.46 = 5,490.54 = 7.92% of the settled stakes, 65,886.48 a year. under the strictest definition, 1,840 of the 8,000 return instead of 620: the same book of bets voids 1,220 more times, and 11,468.00 more in stakes is handed back, for the same set of performances.
Every figure on this site is illustrative and derives from the ten samples defined on this page. No real operator, player, team, match or market is described, and no live price is reproduced. The desk explains how a market on one person is projected, confirmed and voided; it names no operator, it recommends nothing, it predicts nothing, it rates nothing, and it gives no method for evading a limit or a settlement rule.

Read next